Reprint of
Recommendations for Follow-Up of Health-Care Workers After Occupational
Exposure to Hepatitis C Virus
from MMWR Vol. 46, No. 26, 7/4/97
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease in the
United States and worldwide. At least 85% of persons with HCV infection become
chronically infected, and chronic liver disease with persistently elevated liver enzymes
develops in approximately 70% of all HCV-infected persons. 1
Persons with chronic hepatitis C are at risk for cirrhosis and primary
hepatocellular carcinoma. Most HCV transmission is associated with direct percutaneous
exposure to blood. Health-care workers (HCWs) are at occupational risk for acquiring
this viral infection. However, no vaccine is available to prevent hepatitis C, and
immune globulin is not recommended for postexposure prophylaxis.
In the absence of 1) pre-exposure or postexposure prophylaxis, 2) recommendations that
are unique for HCV to prevent HCV transmission to others, and 3) effective therapy for
most persons with chronic hepatitis C, the overall public health benefit associated with
the identification of HCV infections in HCWs will be limited. However, to address
individual workers concerns about risk and outcome, CDC, in collaboration with the
Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, recommends that individual
health-care institutions consider implementing policies and procedures for follow-up for
HCV infection after percutaneous or permucosal exposures to blood.2
At a minimum, such policies should include
- for the source, baseline testing for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV);
- for the person exposed to an anti-HCVpositive source, baseline and follow-up
(e.g., 6-month) testing for anti-HCV and alanine aminotransferase activity;
- confirmation by supplemental anti-HCV testing of all anti-HCV results reported as
repeatedly reactive by enzyme immunoassay (EIA);
- recommending against postexposure prophylaxis with immune globulin or anti-viral agents
(e.g., interferon); and
- education of HCWs about the risk for and prevention of bloodborne infections, including
hepatitis C, in occupational settings, with the information routinely updated to ensure
accuracy.
Follow-up studies of HCWs who sustained a percutaneous exposure to blood from an
anti-HCVpositive patient have reported an average incidence of anti-HCV
seroconversion after unintentional needlesticks or sharps exposures of 1.8% (range:
07%). 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 A seroconversion rate of
6% was documented in the United States4 ; in Japan, the
incidence was 10% based on detection of HCV RNA by PCR. 5
Although these follow-up studies have not documented transmission associated with mucous
membrane or nonintact skin exposures, the transmission of HCV from a blood splash to the
conjunctiva was described in one case report. 6
In February 1994, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices reviewed data about
the prevention of HCV infection with immune globulin and concluded that there was no basis
for supporting the use of immune globulin for postexposure prophylaxis of hepatitis C.
There have been no assessments of the prevention of HCV infection with antiviral agents
(e.g., alpha interferon), and the mechanisms of the effect of interferon in treating
patients with hepatitis C are poorly understood; an established infection may need to be
present for interferon to be an effective treatment. 7
Interferon must be administered by injection and may cause severe side
effects. Based on these considerations, postexposure prophylaxis regimens with antiviral
agents for HCV infection are not recommended.
Several studies suggest that interferon treatment begun early in the course of HCV
infection is associated with a higher rate of resolved infection. Among HCWs
in the postexposure period, onset of HCV infection could be detected earlier by measuring
HCV RNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) rather than by measuring anti-HCV using EIA.
However, PCR is not a licensed assay, and the accuracy of the results are highly
variable. In addition, there are no data indicating that treatment begun early
during the course of chronic HCV infection is less effective than treatment begun during
the acute phase of infection. Furthermore, alpha interferon is approved for the treatment
only of chronic hepatitis C. Determination of whether treatment of HCV
infection is more beneficial in the acute phase than in the early chronic phase will
require evaluation with well-designed research protocols.
In the absence of postexposure prophylaxis, at least six issues need to be considered
in defining a protocol for the follow-up of HCWs occupationally exposed to HCV:
- Limited data about the occupational risk for transmission.
Although
needlestick exposure to infectious blood is a risk factor for hepatitis C and this risk is
intermediate between that of hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus, data are
limited or nonexistent about the risk for transmission associated with other types of
occupational exposures. Thus, meaningful estimates of the risk for HCV infection cannot be
provided to HCWs who sustain such exposures.
- Limitations of available serologic testing for detecting infection and
determining infectivity.
Testing methods readily available in the clinical setting are
subject to some limitations. For the commercially available EIAs that detect
anti-HCV, the
average interval between exposure and seroconversion is 810 weeks. In many
populations, including HCWs, the rate of false positivity for anti-HCV is at least 50%,
and supplemental assays always should be used to assess the validity of repeatedly
reactive EIA results. Approximately 5% of infections will not be detected unless PCR
is used to detect HCV RNA. Although such assays are available from several
commercial laboratories for research use, they are not standardized, and each test costs
approximately $200. Both false-positive and false-negative results can occur as a
consequence of improper handling and storage or contamination of test samples. In
addition, the detection of HCV RNA may be intermittent, and a single
negative PCR test
result is not conclusive.
- Poorly defined risk for transmission by sexual and other exposures.
All anti-HCV positive persons should be considered potentially infectious; however,
neither the presence of antibody nor the presence of HCV RNA is a direct measure of
infectivity in settings where inapparent parenteral or mucosal exposures occur. Although
epidemiologic studies have implicated exposure to infected sexual and household contacts
as well as to multiple sex partners in the transmission of HCV, the efficiency of
transmission from these exposures is low ( 1 ). Studies of infants born to
anti-HCVpositive mothers have documented an average rate of perinatal
transmission
of 5%, increasing to 9% among infants born to mothers who were HCV RNA-positive at the
infants birth ( 8 ). Acquisition of HCV infection from breast milk has not been
documented, and in studies of breastfeeding among infants born to HCV-infected women, the
average rate of infection was 4% in both breastfed and bottle-fed infants. 8
- Limited benefit of therapy for chronic disease.
One benefit from a follow-up
protocol is the opportunity for eligible HCWs to seek evaluation for chronic liver disease
and treatment. Although alpha interferon therapy is safe and effective for the
treatment
of chronic hepatitis C 9, sustained response rates generally
are low (10% 20% in the United States); the occurrence of mild to moderate side
effects in most patients has required discontinuation of therapy in up to 15% of patients.
No clinical, demographic, serum biochemical, serologic, or histologic features have been
identified that reliably predict which patients will respond to treatment and sustain a
long-term remission.
- Cost of follow-up.
The estimated annual cost of providing postexposure
follow-up testing nationally is $2$4 million; the estimated cost for each person for
a 6-month course of therapy is $200,000 (CDC, unpublished data, 1995).
- Medical and legal implications.
A postexposure follow-up protocol will
address individual workers concerns about their risk for HCV infection and possible
disease outcomes, and identify those HCWs who become infected with HCV; this
information
provides HCWs with the opportunity to be counseled about their risk for transmitting HCV
to others and to be evaluated for development of chronic disease, and, if eligible, for
therapy for chronic hepatitis C.
Counseling recommendations to prevent transmission of HCV to others10
are that 1) persons who are anti-HCVpositive should refrain from donating blood,
organs, tissues, or semen, and 2) household contacts should not share toothbrushes and
razors. However, there are neither recommendations against pregnancy or
breastfeeding nor
recommendations for changes in sexual practices among HCV-infected persons with a steady
partner. Although HCV sometimes can be transmitted from persons with chronic disease to
their steady sex partners, the risk for transmission is low despite long-term, ongoing
sexual activity. Infected persons should be informed of the potential risk for sexual
transmission to assist in decision-making about precautions. Persons with multiple sex
partners should adopt safer sex practices, including reducing the number of sex partners
and using barriers (e.g., latex condoms) to prevent contact with body fluids.
Reported by: Hepatitis Br, Div of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases,
National Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC.
References
1. Alter MJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis C in the West. Semin Liver Dis
1995;15:514.
2. CDC. Risk of acquiring hepatitis C for health care workers and recommendations for
prophylaxis and follow-up after occupational exposure. Hepatitis surveillance report no.
56. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service,
1995:3 6.
3. Puro V, Petrosillo N, Ippolito G, Italian Study Group on Occupational Risk of HIV
and Other Bloodborne Infections. Risk of hepatitis C seroconversion after occupational
exposures in health care workers. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:2737.
4. Lanphear BP, Linnemann CC Jr, Cannon CG, DeRonde MM, Pendy L, Kerley LM. Hepatitis C
virus infection in health care workers: risk of exposure and infection. Infect Control
Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:74550.
5. Mitsui T, Iwano K, Masuko K, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection in medical personnel
after needle-stick accident. Hepatology 1992;16:110914.
6. Sartori M, La Terra G, Aglietta M, Manzin A, Navino C, Verzetti G. Transmission of
hepatitis C via blood splash into conjunctiva. Scand J Infect Dis 1993;25:2701.
7. Peters M, Davis GL, Dooley JS, Hoofnagle JH. The interferon system in acute and
chronic viral hepatitis. Prog Liver Dis 1986;8:45367.
8. Mast EE, Alter MJ. Hepatitis C. Semin Ped Infect Dis 1997;8:1722.
9. Hoofnagle JH, Di Bisceglie AM. Drug therapy: the treatment of chronic viral
hepatitis. N Engl J Med 1997;336:34756.
10. CDC. Public Health Service inter-agency guidelines for screening donors of blood,
plasma, organs, tissues, and semen for evidence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C. MMWR
1991;40(no. RR-4):117.
[Quiz]
[Next]
|